| Category | | Criteria | | 1 = good / 5 = not | Evaluation |
| Number of channels | INSTAGRAM Newsletter Websites: www.mouratoglou.com, etc. LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok App Netflix: Documentary Amazon: Kindle, Paperback YouTube: Podcast Spotify: Podcasts Streaming: UTS Hotels and tennis centers in France, Dubai, Malaysia, Greece NFTs ... | High number: 1. Diversity, 2. Range | > 10 | 1 | Extremely diverse, fully digitized for a) Communication and dialogue b) Product processes in exchange with users |
| Number of accounts on central SM channel = primary distributors of posts | Instagram: 1. THE COACH = persönlicher Kanal 2. Mouratoglou Tennis Academy = organizational channel 3. Additional: UTS = new product channel | Low number: = Concentration and therefore high efficiency | 2 | 1 | Good because... a) Clear focus on people and organization = very little duplication of content b) Multiple use of content on other channels = distribution |
| original reach on central channel | on INSTAGRAM: 1. Person: 2.714 posts, 650k followers, 960 following 2. Academy: 3.034 posts, 226k followers, 600 following | IMPORTANT: Retain users and increase your reach | | 1 | Personal accounts have a wider reach (factor approx. 2.88) = are more popular than those of organizations. This comes as no surprise. We learn that heroes are needed in every communication, campaign, story, and post. They are the center of attention, not the company. |
| generated reach via second-tier distributors | This goes beyond the accounts a) of tennis players b) influencer followers c) visitors, fans | High distribution through third parties = good structure | | 1 | This works really well, of course: a) Players with a large reach repost on their own accounts b) Followers with a large reach repost because the content is highly relevant c) Visitors, fans, and friends with a smaller reach but in large numbers post This means that all posts can achieve a good snowball effect = high virality, good distribution |
| Frequency: Number of posts on central channel(s) | 1. Person: approx. 1 post per day 2. Academy: approx. 1 post per week | high frequency | | 1 | High frequency, especially on the personal account. Since there is little overlap between the posts on both accounts, this means that users never get bored, even if they follow both accounts. |
| Likes for posts | 1. Person: Likes last 10 posts, (23.4.22): 13.021, 25.759, 23.008, 10.118, 7.710, 31.329, 25.328, 34.693, 6.784, 5.438 2. Academy: Likes last 10 posts: 10.308, 5.089, 3.129, 4.865, 10.730, 5.558, 9.687, 5.433, 4.842, 12.241 | Participation = Relevance 1. order | ∅18.319 ∅7.188 | 1 | The relevance of the personal account is 2.5 times better. |
| Comments on the posts | | Interaction = Relevance 2. order | | 2 | One minor caveat: there could be more dialogue here, i.e., responses and reactions. The participants are very willing to engage. |
| Format of posts | 1. Person: a) Tips: instructional videos with famous and b) unknownpeople, c) photos, galleries, by and featuring Patrick, d) videos and images related to current tennis events, e) what Patrick is experiencing, etc. 2. Academy: about athletes, fans, activities, events at/around the academy | | | 1 | Good: The formats are very good and clearly structured. Thanks to their layout, structure, and design elements, they are immediately recognizable and offer very high utility value, especially the tips! The prominent athletes are another important factor in their success. |